Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

3D Scan Guide LLC v. Chrome Full Arch Guided Systems et al, No. 2:23-cv-00194 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 25, 2023)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00194, Dkt. No. 21
Decided
August 25, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(3) or in the Alternative to Transfer Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 7.) Plaintiff opposes the Motion and requests leave to conduct targeted discovery in the alternative. (Dkt. No. 12.) For the following reasons, the Court finds that ruling on the Motion should be CARRIED until targeted jurisdictional discovery is complete and supplemental briefing has been filed.