Athalonz LLC v. Under Armour, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00193 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2024)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Athalonz, LLC’s (“Athalonz”) Motion to Compel Compliance with Discovery Order (the “First Motion to Compel”) (Dkt. No. 41) and Motion to Compel Production of Physical Samples and Sales Information (the “Second Motion to Compel ”) (Dkt. No. 50) (collectively, the “Motions”). In the Motions, Athalonz moves to compel Defendant Under Armour, Inc. (“UA”) to produce nine categories of documents and items. Having considered the Motions, and the subsequent briefing the Court finds that the First Motion to Compel (Dkt. No.