Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Athalonz LLC v. Under Armour, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00193 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 20, 2023)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00193, Dkt. No. 46
Decided
December 20, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER denying 17 Opposed MOTION to Change Venue Motion to Transfer Venue to District of Maryland Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Under Armour, Inc.’s (“Under Armour”) Motion to Transfer this case to the District of Maryland pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (“Motion to Transfer”). (Dkt. No. 17.) Having considered the Motion to Transfer, the subsequent briefing, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion to Transfer should be and hereby is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This is a case for patent infringement brought by Athalonz LLC (“Athalonz”) against Under Armour.