Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00059, Dkt. No. 414
Decided
August 22, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 396 Motion for New Trial; denying 397 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law
Length
38 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for New Trial filed by Plaintiff Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (“Touchstream”). (Dkt. No. 396.) Also b efore the Court is Touchstream’s Motion and Memorandum in Support of its Rule 50(b) Motion for Renewed Judgment as a Matter of Law (the “JMOL Motion”). (Dkt. No. 397.) Having considered the Motion for New Trial and JMOL Motion, the Court finds that both motions should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Touchstream filed the above-captioned case on February 16, 2023. (Dkt. No.