Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Charter Communications, Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00059 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00059, Dkt. No. 259
Decided
January 10, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION (Motion(s)89 terminated)
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Touchstream’s Motion to Strike the Opinions of W. Christopher Bakewell, Charter’s Damages Expert. Dkt. No. 89. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. LEGAL STANDARD An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c) the tes…