Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00030 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 8, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00030, Dkt. No. 106
Decided
March 8, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 53 MOTION to Dismiss Counterclaims filed by Instant Connect Software, LLC, Dillon Kane Group LLC
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims filed by Counterclaim Defendants Dillon Kane Group LLC (“DKG”) and Instant Connect Software LLC (“ICS”). Dkt. No. 53. Counterclaim Plaintiff Motorola Solutions, Inc. opposed the Motion with a response and sur-reply. Dkt. No. 63; Dkt. No. 73. For the reasons provided below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This case was brought by STA , with the First Amended Complaint alleging patent infringement against Motorola. Dkt. No. 137.