Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00030 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00030, Dkt. No. 100
Decided
March 6, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 13 MOTION to Dismiss UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Motorola Solutions, Inc
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss. Dkt. No. 13. In the motion, Motorola argues that Plaintiff STA Group LLC fails to plead a plausible claim of infringement for any patent. For the following reasons, the Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND STA alleges that Motorola infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 8,014,324 (the “’324 Patent”), 8,145,249 (the “’249 Patent”), 9,049,737 (the “’737 Patent”), and 9,319,852 (the “’852 Patent”). (Mot. at 2.).