Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smart Path Connections, LLC v. Nokia Corporation et al, No. 2:22-cv-00296 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 6, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00296, Dkt. No. 249
Decided
March 6, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 113 SEALED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT on Certain of Nokia's Affirmative Defenses (Nos. 6, 7, 13, 15, 16, 17) filed by Smart Path Connections, LLC
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Smart Path Connections, LLC’s (“SPC”) Motion for Summary Judgment on Certain of Nokia’s Affirmative Defenses. (Dkt. No. 113.) After consideration, the Court recommends the motion should be GRANT ED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART as provided below. In its motion, SPC alleges Nokia has failed to support certain of its affirmative defenses, namely waiver, estoppel, acquiescence, unclean hands, prosecution history estoppel, acts of others, license, implied license, exhaustion, and patent misu se. (Mot.