Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ningde Amperex Technology Limited v. Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00232 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00232, Dkt. No. 333
Decided
January 31, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court issues this Order sua sponte . The parties dispute whether CosMX’s California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) claim can and should be tried to the jury in the upcoming trial in this case. (Dkt. No. 290-9 at 30; Dkt. No. 306-3 at 73.) ATL contends that UCL claims cannot be tried to a jury as a matter of law. (Dkt. No. 290- 9 at 30.) CosMX contends that “significant overlap” in factual disputes in the federal and state antitrust counterclaims makes it appropriate and efficient to submit the UCL counter claim to the jury.