Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ningde Amperex Technology Limited v. Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00232 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 8, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00232, Dkt. No. 300
Decided
January 8, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Ningde Amperex Technology Limited’s (“ATL”) Opposed Motion for Leave to File a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (the “Motion” or the “Motion for Leave”). (Dkt. No. 263.) In the Motion, ATL requests leave to file a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings as to Defendant Zhuhai CosMX Battery Co. Ltd.’s (“CosMX”) Counterclaim Nos. 7, 8, 9, and 11 (the “Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings”) . (Id. at 1.) CosMX filed a response and ATL filed a reply. (See Dkt. Nos.