Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

CardWare Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00141 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 23, 2023)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00141, Dkt. No. 138
Decided
August 23, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
57 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 103, Ex. A) filed by Plaintiff CardWare Inc. (“Plaintiff” or “CardWare”). Also before the Court is the Responsive Claim C onstruction Brief (Dkt. No. 104) filed by Defendant s Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”) as well as Plaintiff’s reply (Dkt. No. 109). Further before the C ourt are the parties’ Patent Rule 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement (Dkt. No.