Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

OBD Sensor Solutions LLC v. Track What Matters, L.L.C., No. 2:22-cv-00124 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 8, 2023)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00124, Dkt. No. 34
Decided
February 8, 2023
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 32 Report and Recommendation re 18 Motion to Dismiss filed by Track What Matters, L.L.C., 13 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Track What Matters, L.L.C
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 18) and the Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions (the “Motion for Sanctions”) (Dkt. No. 13) filed by Defendant Track What Matters, LLC d/b/a Rhino Fleet Tracking (“Rhino”). On January 20, 2023, Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation recommending denial of Rhino’s Motion to Dismiss and denying Rhino’s Motion for Sanctions. (Dkt. No. 32.) No objections have been filed.