Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

OBD Sensor Solutions LLC v. Track What Matters, L.L.C., No. 2:22-cv-00124 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 2023)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00124, Dkt. No. 32
Decided
January 20, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 18 MOTION to Dismiss UNDER RULE 12(B)(6) filed by Track What Matters, L.L.C., 13 MOTION FOR RULE 11 SANCTIONS filed by Track What Matters, L.L.C
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6) filed by Defendant Track What Matters, L LC d/b/a Rhino Fleet Tracking (“Rhino”) . Dkt. No. 18. For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss should be DENIED.1 I. BACKGROUND On April 22, 2022, Plaintiff OBD Sensor Solutions LLC (“OBDSS”) filed suit against Rhino alleging that Rhino directly and indirectly infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,146,346 ( the “’346 Patent”). Dkt. No. 1 (Complaint) at ¶ 40; Dkt. No. 14 (Amended Complaint) at ¶ 49.