Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Mitel Networks, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 23, 2022)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 178
Decided
September 23, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 67 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Fiserv Solutions, LLC, Fiserv, Inc
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court consolidated defendants Fiserv Inc. and Fiserv Solutions, LLC. (collectively “Fiserv”) move to dismiss for failure to state a claim of direct infringement, and pre- suit indirect and willful infringement. Dkt. No. 67. For the following reasons, the motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Estech Systems IP, LLC brought suit against several companies, including Fiserv, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,068,684 (“’684 Patent”); 7,123,699 (“’699 Patent”); 8,391,298 (“’298 Patent”); and 6,067,349 (“’394 Patent”).