Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Estech Systems IP, LLC v. Mitel Networks, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-00473 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 7, 2022)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00473, Dkt. No. 174
Decided
September 7, 2022
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 33 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(c) filed by Mitel Networks, Inc
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court defendant Mitel Networks, Inc. moves for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Dkt. No. 33. For the following reasons, the motion should be DENIED. I. Background Plaintiff Estech Systems IP, LLC brought suit against several companies, including Mitel, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,068,684 (“’684 Patent”); 7,123,699 (“’699 Patent”); 8,391,298 (“’298 Patent”); and 6,067,349 (“ ’394 Patent”).