Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Varta Microbattery GmbH v. Audio Partnership LLC et al, No. 2:21-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2023)

Denied
Daubert / Expert Challenges Damages
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00400, Dkt. No. 216
Decided
August 22, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 95 Opposed SEALED MOTION Defendant's Daubert Motion Regarding Certain Opinions of William B. Metzdorff filed by EVE Energy Co., Ltd
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant EVE Energy Co., Ltd.’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of William B. Metzdorff (Dkt. No. 95).1 Plaintiff VARTA Microbattery GmbH filed a Response (Dkt. No. 116) , EVE filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 143), and VARTA filed a Sur - reply (Dkt. No. 152). The Court DENIES the motion for the reasons below. I. BACKGROUND On October 25, 2021, VARTA filed suit against Defendants Audio Partnership LL C and Audio Partnership PLC d/b/a Cambridge Audio (together, “Audio Partnership”) and EVE Energy Co., Ltd.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case