Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Varta Microbattery GmbH v. Audio Partnership LLC et al, No. 2:21-cv-00400 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 22, 2023)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00400, Dkt. No. 215
Decided
August 22, 2023
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 91 Opposed MOTION in Limine to Exclude Certain Opinions of Dr. Quinn Horn filed by EVE Energy Co., Ltd
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant EVE Energy Co., Ltd.’s Daubert Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions of Dr. Quinn Horn ( Dkt. No. 91).1 Plaintiff VARTA Microbattery GmbH filed a Response (Dkt. No. 114) , EVE filed a Reply (Dkt. No. 148), and VARTA filed a Sur -reply (Dkt. No. 164). The Court GRANTS IN PART the motion for the reasons below. I. BACKGROUND On October 25, 2021, VARTA filed suit against Defendants Audio Partne rship LLC and Audio Partnership PLC d/b/a Cambridge Audio (together, “Audio Partnership”) and EVE Energy Co., Ltd.