Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00378 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00378, Dkt. No. 49
Decided
November 10, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 38 Opposed MOTION Transfer to the Northern District of California Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1404 filed by Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co Ltd., 37 Opposed MOTION to Stay PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW filed by Zh…
Length
19 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 27) filed by filed by Defendant Zhejiang Crystal- Optech Co Ltd. (“Crystal” or “Defendant”). In the Motion, Defendant contend s that dismissal of the above-captioned case is warranted because personal jurisdiction is not proper in the Eastern District of Texas. (Dkt. No. 27 at 1). Also before the Court are Defendant’s Opposed Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (“Motion to Stay”) ( Dkt No.