Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Viavi Solutions Inc. v. Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co Ltd., No. 2:21-cv-00378 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 28, 2022)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00378, Dkt. No. 11
Decided
April 28, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Viavi Solutions Inc.’s (“Viavi”) Motion for Leave to Effect Alternative Service (the “Motion”). (Dkt . No. 6). Having considered the Motion and the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND On October 7, 2021, Viavi filed the above -captioned case again st Defendant Zhejiang Crystal-Optech Co Ltd. (“Crystal China”) asserting claims of patent infringement. (Dkt. No. 1).