Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:21-cv-00033 (E.D. Tex. July 17, 2024)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:21-cv-00033, Dkt. No. 299
Decided
July 17, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 265 MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 50(b) OF INVALIDITY OF THE ASSERTED CLAIMS filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Mot…
Length
23 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (“Samsung”) Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) of Invalidity of the Asserted Claims (the “Motion”). (Dkt . No. 265.) In the Motion, Samsung moves for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) that claims 1, 3, 6, and 8 of U.S. Patent No. RE46,679 (the “’679 Patent”). Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. I.