Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00337 (E.D. Tex. July 15, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00337, Dkt. No. 431
Decided
July 15, 2022
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SUPPORTED BY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Length
16 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

SUPPORTED BY FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A bench trial was held on June 28, 2022, wherein the Court heard evidence and argument on Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Company, Limited’s (“DSC”) counterclaim of prosecution laches. (Dkt. No. 421). The Court has considered the totality of the evidence presented at the jury trial, the bench trial, and in the written record, including the post-trial submissions from the parties (Dkt. Nos. 406, 408, 426, 427) .