Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Seagen Inc. v. Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., No. 2:20-cv-00337 (E.D. Tex. June 28, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00337, Dkt. No. 114
Decided
June 28, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
26 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd.’s (“DSC”) Rule 12(b) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Lack of Personal Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. No. 22) and Motion to Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404 to the District of Delaware (the “Motion to Transfer”). Plaintiff Seagen Inc. (“Seagen”) opposes both motions. For the reasons stated herein, both the Motion to Dismiss and the Motion to Transfer are DENIED. I.