Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Finalrod IP, LLC v. Endurance Lift Solutions, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00189 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 11, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:20-cv-00189, Dkt. No. 134
Decided
October 11, 2021
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER - denying 85 SEALED MOTION to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Joseph C. Hetmaniak
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Exclude Certain Opinions and Testimony of Joseph C. Hetmaniak (“Motion”), filed by Endurance Lift Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant”). Dkt. No. 85. The Defendant asks the Court to strike certain opinions of Mr. Joseph C. Hetmaniak . The Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On June 12, 2020, Plaintiff Finalrod IP, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed this lawsuit alleging the Defendant’s 1.0” and 1.25” Series 300 sucker rod end fittings infringe Claims 13–15 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,385,625 (“’625 Patent” or “patent-in-suit”). See generally Dkt. No.