Finalrod IP, LLC v. Endurance Lift Solutions, Inc., No. 2:20-cv-00189 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 1, 2021)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Counter-Defendant Finalrod IP, LLC (“Finalrod”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F RCP 12(b)(6) and to Strike Pursuant to FRCP 12(f) (“Motion”). (Dkt. No. 17.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38), recommending denial of Finalrod’s Motion. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion (Dkt. No. 17) is DENIED.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error