Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB et al, No. 2:19-cv-00395 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 12, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00395, Dkt. No. 303
Decided
February 12, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 210 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 35 U.S.C. § 101
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Metacluster LT, UAB, and Oxysales, UAB’s (collectively, “Teso”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) and 35 U.S.C. § 101 (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 210). On February 4, 2021, the Court held a hearing on the Motion. Having considered the Motion, the parties’ arguments, related briefing, and relevant authority, the Court finds that the Motion should be DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Luminati Networks Ltd. ( “Luminati”) alleges infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.