Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Bright Data Ltd. v. Teso LT, UAB et al, No. 2:19-cv-00395 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00395, Dkt. No. 191
Decided
December 7, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
24 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, Plaintiff Luminati Networks, Ltd. (“Plaintiff” ) alleges infringement of U.S. Patents 10,257,319, 10,484,510, and 10,469,614 by Defendants Teso LT, UAB, Oxysales, UAB, and Metacluster LT, UAB (collectively, the “Defendants”). Dkt. No. 126 at 4. Each of these patents relates to improving speed and bandwidth efficiency when accessing data over the Internet. See ’319 Patent at 1:23–25; ’510 Patent at 1:26–28; ’614 Patent at 1:19–23. Generally, the parties have two types of disputes.