Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SpaceTime3D, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00372 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00372, Dkt. No. 104
Decided
December 7, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
33 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On October 21, 2020, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms within in United States Patent Nos. 8,881,048 (“the ’048 Patent”); 9,304,654 (“the ’654 Patent”); and 9,696,868 (“the ’868 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Pat ents”). Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos.