Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

SpaceTime3D, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00372 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 25, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00372, Dkt. No. 98
Decided
November 25, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting 71 Motion ; granting 91 Motion. SpaceTime3D is therefore ORDERED to serve its supplemented P.R. 3-1 Infringement Contentions on Samsung by or before 5:00 p.m. on . Samsung is ORDERED to serve its amended P.R. 3-3 Invalidity C…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff SpaceTime3D, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff” or “SpaceTime3D”) Motion Seeking Leave to Supplement its Infringement Contentions (“Plaintiff’s Motion”). (Dkt. No. 71). Also before the Court is Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants” or “Samsung”) (together with Plaintiff, the “Parties”) Motion for Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions (“Defendants’ Motion”). (Dkt. No. 91).