Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Holophane Europe Limited, No. 2:19-cv-00291 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 25, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00291, Dkt. No. 111
Decided
October 25, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Order
Length
56 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On September 9, 2020, the Court held a hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms within United States Patent Nos. 8,870,410 (“the ’410 Patent”); 8,870,413 (“the ’413 Patent”); 9,734,738 (“the ’738 Patent”); 9,947,248 (“the ’248 Patent”); and 10,223,946 (“the ’946 Patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”). Having reviewed the arguments made by the parties at the hearing and in their claim construction briefing, Dkt. Nos.