Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Holophane Europe Limited, No. 2:19-cv-00291 (E.D. Tex. June 26, 2020)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Magistrate Judge previously entered a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), Dkt. No. 63, recommending denial of, among other things, the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), Dkt. No. 27, filed by Defendants Holophane Europe Limit ed, Acuity Brands Lighting De Mexico S DE RL DE CV , Holophane S.A. De C.V., and Arizona (Tianjin) Electronics Products Trade Co., Ltd. (collectively, the “Defendants”). Defendants have now filed an Objection to the R&R. Dkt. No. 67.