Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Oyster Optics, LLC v. Infinera Corporation, Coriant (USA) Inc., Coriant North America, LLC and..., No. 2:19-cv-00257 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2021)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00257, Dkt. No. 245
Decided
March 23, 2021
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 104 SEALED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ON DEFENDANTS FOURTH COUNTERCLAIM OF DECLARATORY JUDGMENT FOR EXPRESS OR IMPLIED LICENSE AND RELEASE AND RELATED SEVENTH, EIGHTH, AND NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES filed b…
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff Oyster Optics, LLC (“Oyster’s MSJ”) (Dkt. No. 104) and Defendants Infinera Corp., Coriant North America, Coriant Operations, and Coriant (USA) Inc. (“Defendants’ MSJ”) (Dkt. No. 110) (together, the “Cross MSJs”). After careful consideration of the briefing (Dkt. Nos. 104, 110, 134, 146, 165, 175, 185, 191) and the arguments presented at the February 11, 2021 hearing ( see Dkt. No.