Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc. v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00172 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Motion to Dismiss § 101 Eligibility
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00172, Dkt. No. 70
Decided
February 24, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 57 Report and Recommendations
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendant Supercell OY (“Supercell”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Dkt. No. 23.) Within this Motion to Dismiss, Supercell argued that the asserted claims of the patent-in-suit were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 101 because the claims are directe d to an abstract idea of managing a shooting game and because the claims do not recite any inventive concept. (Dkt. No. 23.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 57) to address Supercell’s Motion to Dismiss.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case