Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00161 (E.D. Tex. May 14, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00161, Dkt. No. 113
Decided
May 14, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
68 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are the opening claim construction brief s of GREE, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) (’071 Case Dkt. No. 110, ’161 Case Dkt. No. 75, ’200 Case Dkt. No. 75, ’237 Case Dkt. No. 54, all filed on Feb. 25, 2020),1 the responses of Supercell Oy (“Defendant”) (’071 Case Dkt. No. 120, ’161 Case Dkt. No. 83, ’200 Case Dkt. No. 82, ’237 Case Dkt. No. 60, all filed on Mar. 10, 2020), and Plaintiff’s replies (’071 Case Dkt. No. 122, ’161 Case Dkt. No. 85, ’200 Case Dkt. No. 84, ’237 Case Dkt. No. 62, all filed on Mar. 17, 2020).