Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

GREE, Inc v. Supercell Oy, No. 2:19-cv-00161 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 29, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00161, Dkt. No. 68
Decided
January 29, 2020
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Objection to Report and Recommendation (“the Objection”) filed by Defendant Supercell Oy (“Supercell”). (Dkt. No. 60). In the Objection, Supercell argues that the Magistrate Judge erred in entering a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Dkt. No. 58), which recommended denying the Motion to Dismiss filed by Supercell (Dkt. No. 25) . Plaintiff GREE, Inc. (“GREE”) has filed a response to Supercell’s Objection (“the Response”). (Dkt. No. 62).