Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

LBS Innovations, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00119 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00119, Dkt. No. 76
Decided
March 24, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Strike. Dkt. No. 60. 1 Apple argues that the expert declaration submitted by Plaintiff LBS Innovations, LLC’s (“LBSI”) expert Scott A. Denning (Dkt. No. 54-8) should be stricken for two different reasons. Dkt. No. 60. First, Apple argues that the declaration should be stricken because the Denning Declaration was not identified or disclosed to Apple prior to LBSI filing its opening claim construction brief, in violation of Local Patent Rules 4-2 and 4-3. Id. at 2–6.