Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

LBS Innovations, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00119 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 26, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00119, Dkt. No. 61
Decided
February 26, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Change Venue to the Northern District of California (Dkt. No. 29).1 After analyzing the convenience factors, the Court concludes that Defendant has failed to show that the Northern District of California (“N.D. Cal.”) is a clearly more convenient forum than the Eastern District of Texas (“E.D. Tex.”). The Court therefore DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Change Venue. I.