Kipb LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00056 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2020)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
On February 26, 2020, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,885,055 (the “’055 Patent”). The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 61, 63, 65, and 66) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum and Order. 1 See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error