Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Kipb LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00056 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 26, 2020)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00056, Dkt. No. 79
Decided
March 26, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
28 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On February 26, 2020, the Court held an oral hearing to determine the proper construction of the disputed claim terms in U.S. Patent No. 6,885,055 (the “’055 Patent”). The Court has considered the parties’ claim construction briefing (Dkt. Nos. 61, 63, 65, and 66) and arguments. Based on the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, the Court construes the disputed terms in this Memorandum and Order. 1 See Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005); Teva Pharm. USA, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 831 (2015).