Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Kipb LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:19-cv-00056 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00056, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
November 20, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 37 MOTION to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Qualcomm Global Trading Pte. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.,, Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America…
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Case Pending Ex Parte Reexamination (“Motion to Stay”) (Dkt. No. 37), which was filed by Defendants Qualcomm Global Trading Pte. Ltd., Samsung Austin Semiconductor LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Elect ronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively “Defendants”). After consideration, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Stay.