Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fireblok IP Holdings, LLC v. Hilti, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00023 (E.D. Tex. June 9, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00023, Dkt. No. 88
Decided
June 9, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 29 SEALED MOTION filed by Hilti, Inc., 77 SEALED MOTION FOR EXCEPTIONAL CASE filed by Hilti, Inc
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is a Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule 11 Motion”), Dkt. No. 29, and Motion for Exceptional Case (“Section 285 Motion”), Dkt. No. 77, filed by Defendant Hilti, Inc. (“Hilti”). In the Section 285 Motion, Hilti asks that this Court find this case exceptional and award Hilti “its reasonable attorneys’ fees of $269,214.91.” Id. at 13.