Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fireblok IP Holdings, LLC v. Hilti, Inc., No. 2:19-cv-00023 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 27, 2020)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
License / Exhaustion Summary Judgment
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:19-cv-00023, Dkt. No. 75
Decided
February 27, 2020
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 69 Report and Recommendations, OVERRULES FireBloks Objections (Docket No. 73). Hiltis Motion for Summary Judgement (Docket No. 51) is GRANTED. FireBloks Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 5…
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

FireBlok IP Holdings, LLC, sued Hilti, Inc., for patent infringement, claiming that Hilti’s Firestop Box Insert (“Insert”) infringed FireBlok’s U.S. Patent No. 6,252,167. See Docket No. 1. Hilti countered that it was protected under a license between Intumescent Technologies, LLC, FireBlok’s predecessor-in-interest, and RectorSeal, LLC, Hilti’s purported sole supplier. Docket Nos. 29, 29-5.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case