Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sol IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00526 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 20, 2020)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00526, Dkt. No. 533
Decided
April 20, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 319 SEALED MOTION to Strike Sol IP's First and Third Supplements to First Amended Infringement Contentions
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’1 Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s First and Third Supplements to First Amended Infringement Contentions (“Motion to Strike”). Dkt. No. 319. This Motion to 1 The Court will refer to Defendants and Intervenors collectively as “Defendants” for the purposes of this Order. The Court will refer to AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Communications Co. L.P., 2 / 13 Strike seeks to strike two different supplements to Plaintiff Sol IP, LLC’s (“Sol IP”) infringement contentions.