Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Sol IP, LLC v. AT&T Mobility LLC, No. 2:18-cv-00526 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:18-cv-00526, Dkt. No. 293
Decided
January 7, 2020
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 248 Opposed MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS filed by AT&T Mobility LLC, Sprint Solutions, Inc., Sprint Communications Company L.P., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Sprint Spectrum …
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Opposed Motion fo r Leave to Amend Invalidity Contentions (“Motion for Leave”), which was filed by Defenda nts AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Solutions, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P. (collectively “Defendants”). Dk t. No. 248. This Motion seeks to add the IEEE 802.11n standard as a reference within Defendants’ Invalidity Contentions. Id.