Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Invensas Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00670 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 7, 2018)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00670, Dkt. No. 202
Decided
November 7, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 163 Opposed SEALED PATENT MOTION RENEWED MOTION TO TRANSFER UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants filed their Opposed Renewed Motion to Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) [Dkt. #163].1 The Court previously denied transfer in a Memorandum Opinion entered on August 14, 2018 [Dkt. #145]. In that order, the Court noted that it was speculative at the time as to whether the Protective Communications Agreement (“PCA”) would be implicated. Id . In their Renewed Motion, Defendants argue that Pla intiff’s recent actions create a present dispute under the PCA. Defs.’ Renewed Mot. 4–7.