Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Invensas Corporation v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00670 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6, 2018)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00670, Dkt. No. 201
Decided
November 6, 2018
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 168 Second SEALED MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Invensas Corporation
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Plaintiff filed its Second Motion to Compel Discovery [Dkt. #168].1 This Motion to Compel seeks relief on two issues: (1) whether Defendants are required to provide financial data on all infringing sales made by the Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“SEC”) in this case; and (2) whether Defendants are required to provide financial data for chips used in Samsung’s non-mobile products.2 Pl.’s Mot.; 10/12/18 Hr’g Tr. at 5:8–6:16 [Dkt. #190].