Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00662 (E.D. Tex. May 6, 2019)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Payne’s Report and Recommendation regarding Defendants’ Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment of No Pre-Suit Damages, which has not been objected to. (Dkt. No. 456.) Also before the Court are (1) Objections to the Court’s Order on the Motion to Preclude Expert Testimony on Certain Evidence in Support of Defendants’ Written Description Defense (Dkt. No. 480); (2) Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment that the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent Nos.