Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00662 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 26, 2019)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00662, Dkt. No. 474
Decided
April 26, 2019
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 298 Opposed SEALED MOTION Rule 702 and Daubert Motion to Exclude Expert Opinions of Mr. Walter Bratic filed by Sprint Spectrum, L.P., T-Mobile US, Inc., Ericsson Inc., Nokia of America Corporation, Nextel Operations, Inc…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

In this patent case, Defendants move to exclude expert opinions of Walter Bratic, Plaintiff’s damages expert (Dkt. No. 298) .1 Bratic opines that Plaintiff is entitled to reasonable royalty damages up to the expected date of trial for the alleged infringement of Plaintiff’s U.S. Patent Nos. 8,682,357; 8,897,828; 9,320,018; 9,532,330; 9,681,466; and 8,953,641. (Dkt. No. 298- 2); (Dkt. No. 298-3).