Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Seven Networks, LLC v. Google LLC, No. 2:17-cv-00442 (E.D. Tex. July 6, 2018)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00442, Dkt. No. 218
Decided
July 6, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 168 Opposed MOTION for Leave to File SUPPLEMENT INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS TO SUPPLEMENT GREENPOWER AND ADD XIAO
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Google LLC, Samsung Electronics Co., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Dkt. No. 168). Having considered the Motion, the Court is of the opinion that the Motion should be GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. Local Patent Rule 3-6(b) allows a party to supplement its Invalidity Contentions “only by order of the Court, which shall be entered only upon a showing of good cause.” P.R. 3-6(b).