Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Team Worldwide Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00235 (E.D. Tex. June 6, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00235, Dkt. No. 230
Decided
June 6, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 168 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 169 Motion to Expedite
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Wal- Mart.com USA LLC, and Sam’s West, Inc. ’s (“Walmart”) and Intex Recreati on Corp. and Intex Trading Ltd. (“Intex”), The Coleman Company, Inc. (“Coleman”) , and Bestway (USA), Inc. ’s (“Bestway”)(“Intervenors”), (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Stay All Deadlines Pending Resolution of the Petition for Writ of Mandamus (Dkt. No. 168) (“the Motion”). On June 1, 2018, the Court heard oral argument on said Motion. (Dkt. No.