Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Team Worldwide Corporation v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al, No. 2:17-cv-00235 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 7, 2017)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:17-cv-00235, Dkt. No. 84
Decided
December 7, 2017
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 64 MOTION to Intervene filed by Bestway (USA), Inc., 35 MOTION to Intervene filed by The Coleman Company, Inc., 54 MOTION to Amend/Correct 35 MOTION to Intervene filed by The Coleman Company, Inc., 77 MOTION …
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court a re three motions: (1) Intex Recreation Corp. and Intex Trading Ltd.’s Motion to Intervene (Dkt. No. 29) ; (2) the Coleman Company, Inc.’s Motion to Intervene (Dkt. No. 35); and (3) Bestway (USA), Inc.’s Motion to Intervene (Dkt. No. 64). Having considered these Motions and the relevant authorities, the Court is of the opinion that each of the Motions should be GRANTED as set forth herein. I.