Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Fundamental Innovation Systems International LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc. et al, No. 2:16-cv-01425 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2018)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:16-cv-01425, Dkt. No. 125
Decided
February 13, 2018
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
8 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

On January 3, 2018, Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne issued an opinion and order denying the LG defendants’ motion to transfer this case to the District of New Jersey, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Dkt. No. 104. The basis of Magistrate Judge Payne’s opinion was that the LG defendants had not met their threshold burden of establishing that the District of New Jersey would have had personal jurisdiction over one of the defendants, LG Electronics Alabama, Inc. (“LG Alabama”). Id. 3-6; see In re Volkswagen AG (Volkswagen I), 371 F.3d 201, 203 (5th Cir.